Trovo molto stimolante e opportuno il post di Shel Holtz sul tema della capacità dei blogger di influenzare le scelte di acquisto, ovvero più in generale il mercato. Che cosa sono realmente capaci di fare gli A-lister, come vengono talvolta definiti i blogger più influenti ?
Lo spunto viene da uno studio:
“There’s a fair amount of buzz over a study issued recently from the Canadian research firm Pollara that supports the notion that influential bloggers aren’t really so influential. Eighty percent of the 1,100 adults polled in December reported that they would be more inclined to make a purchase recommended by friends and family compared to only 23% who would consider recommendations from “well-known bloggers.”
Why this comes as a surprise to anybody escapes me. I would have bet real money on this. After all, would you buy a particular new car based on what a well-known auto critic wrote in a daily newspaper or what Uncle Marvin told you after he’d been driving one for six months? “
Prosegue Shel:
“..What’s more surprising to me is the conclusions people are drawing from the study. Rubel, for instance, suggests that outreach efforts that focus on reach miss the big picture. “Trust is by far a more important metric.”
Really ? Whatever happened to the importance of building awareness? While the influential bloggers—the so-called “A-listers”—may not have influence, they do have eyeballs. They are A-listers, after all, because people read them. I may have greater trust in my friend in the next cube, but where did he hear about it? And if he heard about it from a trusted friend or family member, they read about it from a source that gets broad distrtibution. The information has to start somewhere.”
Ma allora qual’è in realtà l’obbiettivo possibile di certe “campagne” che le aziende rivolgono verso alcuni blogger ?
“My goal in reaching out to widely-read bloggers is not to trick them into using their influence to get other people to buy the product. It is, rather, to create awareness and get people talking.”
Shel conclude con una interessante e saggia osservazione: ci sono molte dimensioni sotto cui questi processi possono essere valutati, molte sfumature, molte “shades of grey”. Lo studio in questione dovrebbe forse significare che non vale la pena di raggiungere blogger con pubblici particolarmente ampi in confronto a piccole comunità o gruppi con livelli di “trust” più elevati ? Certo no: “Those blogs with high levels of readership are one way to kick-start the conversation among the groups of trusted individuals in the first place.”
A adesso una domanda: secondo voi inziative rivolte ai blogger come quelle lanciate attorno a un brand come Alixir, hanno davvero senso ? Sono davvero concepite per far partre le conversazioni o si pongono in realtà in modo “promozionale” nel senso più tradizionale del termine, e quindi usano di fatto logiche “vecchie” verso un fenomeno totalmente nuovo e diverso ? I contributi sono benvenuti…